Reason for Lawsuit in Spinal Cord Injury Affects Final Outcome.

نویسندگان

  • Robert S Quigley
  • Yusuf T Akpolat
  • Brent D Forrest
  • Montri D Wongworawat
  • Wayne K Cheng
چکیده

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To review past cases and analyze them to determine whether reason for lawsuit led to a defense versus plaintiff verdict when patients sustain spinal cord injury. Secondary objectives included analyzing demographic factors and monetary awards for plaintiff verdicts and settlements. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Evaluating malpractice cases could provide valuable information for the physician who has been sued by a patient. Previous studies about litigation and spine have been focused on medical tort reform and not on the reasons for litigation and lawsuit outcome. METHODS A large national medicolegal research service for civil and criminal court called "VerdictSearch" was queried for "spinal cord injury" between the years 2000 and 2010. Reason for lawsuit separated into 2 groups, error in diagnosis (n = 48), and error in treatment (n = 25). The anatomical region, outcome, cost, and job for sued health care workers recorded for each lawsuit. RESULTS Compared with physicians who were sued for errors in diagnosis, those sued for an error of treatment had a relative risk of 2.69 (95% confidence interval, 1.40-5.16) to receive a defense verdict (P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in demographic information, including age, sex, occupation type, and level of injury. Among specialties, surgeons had the highest number of suits. The median value for each anatomic area was highest in thoracic spine ($1.90 million), followed by cervical spine ($1.80 million) and lumbar spine ($0.750 million), although there were no statistical differences between the 3 areas (P = 0.301). The median monetary award for a plaintiff verdict was higher than that for a settlement ($2.90 million, interquartile range: 1.50-12.5 million vs. $1.45 million, interquartile range: 1.00-2.90 million, P = 0.008). CONCLUSION Physicians are more likely to successfully defend a lawsuit for an error in treatment than for an error in diagnosis. The key to increase the success of defending a lawsuit in regard to spinal cord injury is to avoid delayed and incorrect diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE N/A.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Clinical outcome of autologous mononuclear cells transplantation for spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  Background :Cell-based therapies can be used to treat neurological diseases and spinal cord injuries. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of bone marrow derived mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) transplantation in patients with spinal cord injuries.   Method s: Following a systematic review to detect clinical intervention studies, a meta-analysis was done for pooling data to es...

متن کامل

The Effect of Knowledge & Learning on Perception and Experience of Independence among Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

Purpose: Individuals’ personal awareness and learning after spinal cord injury is one of the most important factors in patients’ confrontation with subsequent disabilities and new life style which affects their ultimate independence. This article is an abstracted result of a qualitative study on effective factors of independence among patients with spinal cord injury. Methods: This study a...

متن کامل

Comparison of Agonist vs. Antagonist Stimulation on Triceps Surae Spasticity in Spinal Cord

Objectives: One of the most common and disabling complications that affects individuals with spinal cord injury is spasticity. The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of agonist and antagonist electrical stimulations on triceps surae muscle spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. Methods: A total of 30 subjects with spinal cord injury were considered for the study. They were...

متن کامل

Acute Administration of Estradiol Protects against Spinal Ischemic-Reperfusion Injury in Male Rabbits

Introduction: Postoperative neurological deficit is the most devastating complication after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Despite demonstrated neuroprotective effects of estradiol, its protective efficacy against spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion and underlying mechanisms are not yet elucidated. Methods: Two groups, each of 10 New Zealand white male rabbits, were studied. Control g...

متن کامل

A Case of Gunshot Injury to the Spinal Cord in a Dog: Clinical, Surgical, and X-ray Features.

Case description- A five-year-old female dog, weighing 35 kg, was presented as an emergency case after it suffered a gunshot injury.Clinical findings - Physical examination of the dog revealed paraplegia, the symptoms were normal. There was no bone fracture and dislocation in the lower extremity examination. A bullet (diameter, 4 mm) between the third and fourth lumbar was observed on rad...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Spine

دوره 40 11  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015